Order N°2020-427 dated 15 April 2020 on various time limits dispositions regarding the COVID-19 pandemic
Order n°2020-427 dated 15 April 2020 on various time-limit dispositions regarding the covid-19 pandemic modifies the provisions of Order 2020-306 of 25 March 2020 on the extension of the time limits during the period of health emergency and the adaptation of procedures during the same period.
It should be reminded that Order No. 2020-306 of 25 March 2020 introduced a mechanism for deferring various time limits and expiry dates. To this end, it defined, in Article 1(I), a “legally protected period” (hereinafter the “Legally Protected Period”) which runs from 12 March 2020 until the expiry of a period of one month after the end of the state of health emergency.
The end of this state of emergency is currently set for 24 May 2020 but could be modified in the coming weeks, the date of 11 May 2020 being envisaged under the terms of the report to the President of the Republic accompanying the order of 15 April 2020. To date, the Legally Protected Period therefore corresponds to the period from 12 March 2020 to 24 June 2020.
The Order of 15 April 2020 makes additions/modifications to the following points:
Article 2 of the Order of 15 April 2020 specifies the scope of Article 2 of Order 2020-306 of 25 March 2020, which provides for the postponement of any act or formality (appeal, legal action, formality, registration, declaration, notification or publication) prescribed by law or regulation on pain of penalty (nullity, lapse, foreclosure, prescription, unenforceability, irreceivability, lapse of time, automatic withdrawal, application of a special regime, nullity or forfeiture of any right) and which should have occurred between 12 March and the Legally Protected Period.
Are therefore excluded from the scope of application of Article 2 of Order No. 2020-306 the “time limits for reflection, retraction or renunciation provided for by law or regulation, nor the time limits provided for the reimbursement of sums of money in case of exercise of these rights.”
Regarding real estate sales, the withdrawal period provided for in Article L271-1 of the Construction and Housing Code is therefore excluded from the scope of this provision.
Article 2 of the Order of 25 March 2020 thus constitutes neither a suspension nor an extension of the time limit initially set for acting. It allows to accomplish a posteriori what it was impossible to do during the Legally Protected Period.
Under the terms of the Order, this Article 2 has an interpretative effect on the dispositions provided for in Article 2 of the Order of 25 March 2020; it therefore has retroactive application.
Article 4 of Order no. 2020-427 of 15 April 2020 amends and completes Article 4 of Order no. 2020-306 relating to the duration of penalty payments and the application of penalty clauses, termination clauses and forfeiture clauses, it being specified that under the terms of the first paragraph of Article 4 of the Order of 25 March 2020, these clauses and penalty payments are suspended during the Legally Protected Period.
Two paragraphs are added as follows:
- The first paragraph refers to the postponement of the effective date of these clauses and penalty payments which should have taken place during the Legally Protected Period.
This taking of effect is postponed until the end of the Legally Protected Period, increased :
– By a period equal to the time elapsed between 12 March 2020 and the date on which performance of the obligation should have taken place ;
– Or by a period equal to the time elapsed between the date on which the obligation arose and the date on which it should have been performed, if this is after 12 March 2020.
For example, if a payment order granting a period of 30 days is delivered on 20 April 2020, the termination clause should theoretically have been acquired on May 20, 2020, 30 days after the delivery of the ineffective order.
Pursuant to the first paragraph added by this new Article 4, the period for activating the termination clause (which is therefore suspended during the Legally Protected Period) resumes as of the end of the Legally Protected Period, i.e. the acquisition of the termination clause on July 24, 2020.
- The second newly added paragraph concerns the postponement of the coming into effect of clauses and penalty payments sanctioning the non-performance of an obligation other than a sum of money, which would expire after the Legally Protected Period.
The date on which these penalty payments and these clauses take effect is thus postponed to a date corresponding to the end of the extended Legally Protected Period:
– If the obligation was to be performed before March 12, 2020, for a period equal to the time elapsed between March 12, 2020 and the end of this Legally Protected Period;
– If the obligation is to be performed after March 12, 2020, for a period equal to the time elapsed between the day on which the obligation should have been performed and the end of this Protected Period.
This new paragraph 2 would apply, for example, in the case of a contract with an obligation to do (other than an obligation to pay) to be performed on 14 June 2020.
If the contract stipulates a penalty clause or a penalty payment taking effect at the end of a period of 10 days from the non-performance of the debtor, i.e. for our example on 25 June 2020, the period of theoretical effect on 25 June 2020 will then be extended by a period of 9 days, corresponding to the time elapsed between the day on which the obligation should have been performed (15 June 2020) and the end of the Legally Protected Period (24 June 2020).
The penalty clause or penalty payment can therefore only take effect from 5 July 2020.
Nevertheless, if a payment order within 30 days targeting the termination clause is issued on June 1, 2020, the termination clause would be acquired on July 1, 2020, i.e. after the Legally Protected Period. However, monetary obligations such as the payment of rents are excluded from the application of this second paragraph, so that the effects of the resolutory clause will not be postponed. The resolutory clause would then be acquired on July 1, 2020.
According to a literal reading of these texts, it would be more advantageous for a lessor to issue a summons to pay with respect to the resolutory clause after May 25, 2020, since its effects would not, in this case, be postponed.
It should be noted that the parties to the contract are free to exclude the application of these new provisions by express terms.
Russian counter measures and measures aimed at business support. Recent developments
Special regime for transactions involving securities On 3 March 2023 Russian President issued Decree No. 138 establishing additional measures involving securities. Namely, the new Decree establishes a specific procedure for transactions / operations involving: shares of Russian joint-stock companies, sovereign bonds, bonds of a Russian issuer, held in collective safe custody of a Russian depository, […]
Sanctions against Russia. Recent developments (2 march 2023 update)
By the end of February, the EU, US and UK announced new rounds of sanctions, all of them including restrictions targeting prominent Russian financial institutions The EU package includes individual listings of Russian entities and individuals and additional exports restrictions. The US sanctions provide for sectoral sanctions targeting Russian mining and metals sector, as well […]
Russian counter measures. Recent developments ( 12 january 2023 update)
Governmental Commission on Foreign Investments revised rules on the sale of assets and the payment of dividends On 30 December 2022, Russian Governmental Subcommission of the Commission of the Ministry of Finance on Foreign Investments (the – Commission) published revised rules and criteria for authorization of the sale of assets in Russian companies involving persons […]
Sanctions against Russia. Recent Developments (21 December 2022 update)
This December, the EU introduced a series of restrictive measures targeting Russia. Council of the EU approved the ninth package of sanctions. Additionally, the European Commission proposed framework that would amend the Lisbon Treaty and harmonize criminalization of violation of sanctions at the level of the Union. Finally, the EU introduced a price cap for […]
Russian counter measures. Recent developments (21 December 2022 update)
Russia has adopted a series of new measures. Namely, the President introduced new restrictions concerning certain transactions involving credit organizations and joint-stock companies that are not credit organizations. The Russian Central Bank issued decision expanding the scope of application of type C accounts. Moreover, the Ministry of Finance issued clarifications on the scope of transactions […]
Legal Alert: The submission to derogation of protected species: the Council of State finally pronounces itself
In an opinion n°463563 issued on December 9, 2022, the Conseil d’Etat finally provided an answer to the questions raised by the Administrative Court of Appeal of Douai in its decision n°20DA01392 of April 27, 2022 >> download the article
Paris | ENERGY AND NATURAL RESOURCES LAW | PUBLIC LAW – PUBLIC CONTRACTS | ENVIRONMENT
Sanctions against Russia : recent developments (18 October updates)
EU Adopts New Package of Sanctions Targeting Russia On 6 October 2022 Council of the European Union adopted an eighth package of sanctions targeting Russia following the recent actions attempted by the Russian Government as part of the special military operation in Ukraine. Besides the extension of the personal sanctions list, EU introduced the following […]
Russian counter measures. Recent developments (29 september 2022 update)
Procedure for the Approval of Transactions with Shares in a Russian LLC Adopted On 19 September 2022 Russian Government introduced amendments establishing a procedure for approval of transactions involving shares in Russian limited liability companies. Such transactions are considered as controlled operations and are to be approved by the Governmental Commission for the Control of […]
Sanctions against russia. Recent revelopments (13 september update)
CONTROL OF TRANSACTIONS WITH SHARES IN AN LLC On 8 September 2022, Russian President issued Decree No. 618 “On Special Procedure for Execution of Certain Transactions (Operations)” (the “Decree”). The decree provides for new rules, specifically for transactions involving transfer of shares in Russian LLCs as well as transactions involving Russian banks under sanctions. We […]
Russian counter measures. Recent Developments (19 August 2022 update)
Russia has adopted a series of new measures. Namely, the President introduced new restrictions concerning transactions with shares in certain Russian companies. The Government added new jurisdictions to the list of unfriendly states. At the same time, the Russian Central Bank suspended some of its previously adopted restrictions. For more information on sanctions targeting Russia, […]
Sanctions against Russia. Recent Developments (9 August update)
On 21 July 2022, Council of the EU adopted a seventh package of sanctions targeting Russia. The new package establishes new bans and exemptions for sectoral sanctions. It also targets new persons and entities, including Sberbank. Additionally, the US expanded their individual sanctions. Below is an overview of the latest sanctions. For more information on […]
Judge’s decision on the appointment of an expert: reversal and clarification of the case law
In cases where the law refers to article 1843-4 of the Civil Code to set the price conditions for the transfer of a partner’s corporate rights, the president of the court hearing a dispute may decide to appoint an expert to determine the value of the corporate rights transferred. Such an expert may also be […]
Paris | COMMERCIAL LITIGATION