You are here: › › › Structuring Secured Debt, Enforcing Security, and Navigating Secured Claims...
Publications

Structuring Secured Debt, Enforcing Security, and Navigating Secured Claims through the Lenses of Financial Restructuring in France: Lessons from the security and workout reforms of 2021 and recent large case precedents

 

Jean-François Adelle, partner, conducted a webinar with Sara El Mouttaqi, associate, on the topic: “Structuring Secured Debt, Enforcing Security, and Navigating Secured Claims through the Lenses of Financial Restructuring in France: Lessons from the security and workout reforms of 2021 and recent large case precedents”.

Key Points discussed:
1. The introduction of a new classes system for affected stakeholders in coercive restructuring proceedings has inspired consensual proceedings, out-of-court work-outs, and safeguard proceedings below relevant thresholds.
2. Securities are structured in a multi-layer pyramid, involving different enforcement rights and treatment under the plan.
3. Despite payment and enforcement actions being frozen, certain security interests like financial collateral, title security, and pledges with effective right of retention can be immediately enforced in coercive proceedings.
4. Large restructuring case precedents highlight that the hierarchy of security interests does not always align with the waterfall principle of the absolute priority rule among classes (e.g., Orpea, Casino), urging secured creditors to advocate for their rights.
5. The treatment of secured creditors by the plan in relation to the security value lacks statutory clarity but has been clarified through case law and precedents:
– Secured creditors with claims exceeding the value of their security assets must be assigned to secured creditors classes for the full amount of their claims (e.g., Bordeaux Court of Appeal, Sept 2024).
– Secured creditors not in the money based on their security assets value can be subject to debt for equity swap, except if they inject new money (e.g., Casino).
6. Secured creditors possessing security with exclusive rights face challenges in realizing the value of their assets and seeking immunity from the plan, except in cases of fiducie-security or financial collateral. Early valuation of security assets and proactive engagement are recommended.

 

If you want to see the replay click here 

Contacts

 

Jean-François
Adelle
Partner Paris

Offices: Paris

Share

Our last publications

French Competition Authority sanctions a predatory acquisition for the first time on the basis of abuse of a dominant position

French Competition Authority (Autorité de la concurrence) has taken a new step in applying the Towercast case law (CJEU, 16 March 2023) by sanctioning for the first time a merger transaction on the basis of abuse of a dominant position. In this article, Renaud Christol and Paul Vialard analyze the key lessons from this decision […]

Publications

| COMPETITION AND ECONOMIC LAW

+

In a ruling handed down on October 18, 2025, the CJEU ruled in Case C-2/24 P, Teva v. Cephalon v. European Commission, clarifying the conditions under which an amicable settlement agreement between patent holders and generic manufacturers can be classified as an anti-competitive agreement. In this article, Renaud Christol and Paul Vialard review the implications […]

Publications

| COMPETITION AND ECONOMIC LAW

+

AMF vs. OCABSA: Does the End Justify the Means? – Finascope 04/08/2025

As the regulator steps up its crackdown on dilutive financing, Frank Martin Laprade analyzes the AMF’s offensive strategy from a legal standpoint. Beyond the goal of protecting retail investors, he raises a fundamental question of principle in this op-ed: can legal certainty be compromised in the name of regulation? An essential read to understand the […]

Publications

Paris | CORPORATE – M&A – PRIVATE EQUITY

+

credits | legal notices | terms of service and confidentiality | personal data policy