What lessons can be drawn from the latest developments in the Vivendi case? – Option Finance, 21/01/2022

 

We knew that the Vivendi case (initiated in 2002 but still not finished 20 years later) was out of the ordinary, but this is confirmed by the latest judicial decision (i.e. the one taken by the Commercial Court of Paris on July 7, 2021), with its international plaintiffs claiming more than 2 billion euros in damages, who were ordered to pay nearly 2.5 million euros in application of article 700 of the Code of Civil Procedure.

[…]

Our last publications

French Competition Authority sanctions a predatory acquisition for the first time on the basis of abuse of a dominant position

French Competition Authority (Autorité de la concurrence) has taken a new step in applying the Towercast case law (CJEU, 16 March 2023) by sanctioning for the first time a merger transaction on the basis of abuse of a dominant position. In this article, Renaud Christol and Paul Vialard analyze the key lessons from this decision […]

| COMPETITION AND ECONOMIC LAW

+

In a ruling handed down on October 18, 2025, the CJEU ruled in Case C-2/24 P, Teva v. Cephalon v. European Commission, clarifying the conditions under which an amicable settlement agreement between patent holders and generic manufacturers can be classified as an anti-competitive agreement. In this article, Renaud Christol and Paul Vialard review the implications […]

| COMPETITION AND ECONOMIC LAW

+

AMF vs. OCABSA: Does the End Justify the Means? – Finascope 04/08/2025

As the regulator steps up its crackdown on dilutive financing, Frank Martin Laprade analyzes the AMF’s offensive strategy from a legal standpoint. Beyond the goal of protecting retail investors, he raises a fundamental question of principle in this op-ed: can legal certainty be compromised in the name of regulation? An essential read to understand the […]

Paris | CORPORATE – M&A – PRIVATE EQUITY

+